Watched: Children of Men
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjRrxj59ifikvpYT6Qz3z3xa5MQA97uFi5KQZpdRfI6AN30NfU9b9uiY7qO-oe1DuIpLzImmDZ0wh-g_-BvApNGPOTTgWtJBzRStKDWo58dmhqe2p6rfCcnjbQrnloX8KmCiOiqnA/s200/404px-children_of_men_3.jpg)
The film takes the books title, character names and a few skeletal plot points, but is otherwise an almost entirely different story. Theo is not a professor of English, but a cynical, depressed public servant. The world he lives in does not have a Utopian surface covering major violations of basic human rights, in fact the loss of human rights is right on the surface, as Clive Owen travels through dark, gray sketches of an almost destroyed Europe.
With such stark differences, it's easy to leave the book behind and take Alfonso Cauron's film at face values. As expected, the colors are carefully controlled, the cinematography is beautiful, the transitional scenes of people simply interacting without the pretext of plot exposition, and the focus of the story thrown onto a backdrop meant to reflect human injustice we see in our own world today.
It's no wonder than, that Cauron opted to change the revolutionaries moving through a world of secret governmental oppression into composite characters moving head-first into a war zone.
What's missing? The theologically deep conversation found in the book, but that's hard to translate to film.
But where the film lacks in James' intelligent dialog, Cauron EXCELS in visual symbolism. Great film all around.