Monday, March 17, 2008

Watched: Children of Men

So I wrote about the book MONTHS ago, but to recap, P. D. James’ dystopian thriller about a world in which men become sterile, centers around Theo, who becomes wrapped up with revolutionaries opposed to the British establishment, which is really focused on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain at the cost of human rights and justice. One of the revolutionaries is found to be pregnant, craziness ensues.

The film takes the books title, character names and a few skeletal plot points, but is otherwise an almost entirely different story. Theo is not a professor of English, but a cynical, depressed public servant. The world he lives in does not have a Utopian surface covering major violations of basic human rights, in fact the loss of human rights is right on the surface, as Clive Owen travels through dark, gray sketches of an almost destroyed Europe.

With such stark differences, it's easy to leave the book behind and take Alfonso Cauron's film at face values. As expected, the colors are carefully controlled, the cinematography is beautiful, the transitional scenes of people simply interacting without the pretext of plot exposition, and the focus of the story thrown onto a backdrop meant to reflect human injustice we see in our own world today.

It's no wonder than, that Cauron opted to change the revolutionaries moving through a world of secret governmental oppression into composite characters moving head-first into a war zone.

What's missing? The theologically deep conversation found in the book, but that's hard to translate to film.

But where the film lacks in James' intelligent dialog, Cauron EXCELS in visual symbolism. Great film all around.

2 Comments:

At 12:02 AM, Blogger Chris Burkhalter said...

i still haven't seen it. :(

I had two friends that, separately, attended the same screening on New Years Eve. Matt said it was among the very best films he'd seen that year. Kerry said it was easily the worst. Take that Ebert & Roeper!

 
At 1:37 PM, Blogger Aaron Burkhalter said...

I wouldn't say it was the BEST, but it was quite good. But I'm also quite the fan of Cuaron if you hadn't noticed.

The one thing I forgot to mention, Cuaron really restrained himself on special effects and the future setting. He didn't spend a lot of time trying to impress you with this beautifully imagined world. There's some things like computer screens that look a bit snazzy, and all the cars are different, but otherwise it looks to be down the road a bit, but not TOO down the road. I liked that a lot.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home